George Ortega,

Nick Vale

Chandler Klebs


Creating a world without blame and guilt

The world's first, and already successful*  initiative, including two TV shows, to popularize the refutation of free will 

*How it happened 

Our World's top four minds, Isaac Newton, Charles Darwin, Sigmund Freud and Albert Einstein each rejected the notion of a human free will.

John Searle, the13th ranked post-1900 philosopher, says that our world overcoming the free will illusion "would be a bigger revolution in our thinking than Einstein, or Copernicus, or Newton, or Galileo, or Darwin -- it would alter our whole conception of our relation with the universe." 

The Washington Post, The New York Times, Psychology Today, Los Angeles Times, The Huffington Post, The Atlantic, The Guardian, USA Today, The Telegraph, Time Magazine, Scientific American, NPR Radio, The Economist, and Science Magazine  all affirm that free will is an illusion.



Exploring the Illusion of Free Will is two TV shows - WHITE PLAINS NY TV and NYC LIVE CALL-IN TV,  several books - Mine and  Enel's,  and Chandler's one meetup - NYC, this website, Internet video and audio -  YOU TUBE  iTUNES AUDIO PODCAST  PUBLIC DOMAIN VIDEOS & MP3s, and a blog - EXOGENOUS AGENCY

Quick Links to the YouTube Episodes: 01-10  11-20  21-30  31-40  41-50  51-60  61-70  71-80  81-90 91-100  101-110  111-120  121-130  131-140  141-150  151-160  161-170  171-180  181-190  191-200  201-210  211-216

Quick Links to the 2013 Exploring the Illusion of Free Will, 2nd Edition Chapters: ( by titleIntro. to 2011 edition  Intro. to 2013 digital edition 1  (2 omitted)  3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   Epilogue  Books Refuting Free Will...


Home    Contact

 iTunes Audio Podcast
 Public Domain Video at Internet Archive
RSS  Mp3 Audio at Internet Archive

Episodes on YouTube
Full YOU TUBE Collection

Site Features

Free Will Refutations in Major Publications


Free Will Refuted in the Blogs


Free Will Refuted on YouTube


Recent books for the public and academia refuting free will


Edited and Revised Transcripts of the First Eighteen Episodes


Quotes Disaffirming Free Will and Affirming Determinism by the Famous


Absurd Free Will Defenses by Major Institutions and Publications Who Should Know Better


Claiming credit for public awareness that free will is an illusion


More Featured Episodes

10. Why Change as the basic Universal Process Makes Free Will Impossible

13. Overcoming Blame, Guilt, Envy and Arrogance by Overcoming the Illusion of Free Will

16. Overcoming the Illusion of Free Will as an Evolutionary Leap in Human Consciousness

17. Revitalizing Religion through Transcending the Illusion of Free Will

26. Because Essential Elements of Every Decision are Stored in Our Unconscious, Free Will is Impossible.

38. The Messenger and I Have Evolved Human Consciousness

50. Freud Popularized the Unconscious.  Ortega is Popularizing Unconscious Will

60. Ten Ways to Refute Free Will


Landmark Coverage Refuting Free Will


USA Today - "Why you don't really have free will by Jerry Coyne January 1, 2012

"The debate about free will, long the purview of philosophers alone, has been given new life by scientists, especially neuroscientists studying how the brain works. And what they're finding supports the idea that free will is a complete illusion."

Time Magazine - "Think You're Operating on Free Will? Think Again" by Eben Harrell July 2, 2010

"In an intriguing review in the July 2 edition of the journal Science, published online Thursday, Ruud Custers and Henk Aarts of Utrecht University in the Netherlands lay out the mounting evidence of the power of what they term the 'unconscious will.'...John Bargh of Yale University, who 10 years ago predicted many of the findings discussed by Custers and Aarts in a paper entitled "The Unbearable Automaticity of Being," called the Science paper a "landmark — nothing like this has been in Science before."

The New York Times - "Your Move: The Maze of Free Will" by Galen Strawson July 22, 2010

"Some people think that quantum mechanics shows that determinism is false, and so holds out a hope that we can be ultimately responsible for what we do. But even if quantum mechanics had shown that determinism is false (it hasn’t), the question would remain: how can indeterminism, objective randomness, help in any way whatever to make you responsible for your actions? The answer to this question is easy. It can’t."

The Atlantic - "The Brain on Trial" by David Eagleman July/August 2011

"In modern science, it is difficult to find the gap into which to slip free will—the uncaused causer—because there seems to be no part of the machinery that does not follow in a causal relationship from the other parts."

The Telegraph - "Neuroscience, free will and determinism: 'I'm just a machine'" by Tom Chivers October 12, 2010

"The philosophical definition of free will uses the phrase 'could have done otherwise'... "As a neuroscientist, you've got to be a determinist. There are physical laws, which the electrical and chemical events in the brain obey. Under identical circumstances, you couldn't have done otherwise; there's no 'I' which can say 'I want to do otherwise'."

The Guardian - "Guilty but not responsible?" by Rosiland English May 29, 2012

"The discovery that humans possess a determined will has profound implications for moral responsibility. Indeed, Harris is even critical of the idea that free will is "intuitive": he says careful introspection can cast doubt on free will. In an earlier book on morality, Harris argues 'Thoughts simply arise in the brain. What else could they do? The truth about us is even stranger than we may suppose: The illusion of free will is itself an illusion'"

Psychology Today - "Free Will Is an Illusion, So What?" by

If you think carefully about any decision you have made in the past, you will recognize that all of them were ultimately based on similar—genetic or social—inputs to which you had been exposed. And you will also discover that you had no control over these inputs, which means that you had no free will in taking the decisions you did.

Complete List


A brief history of determined vs. free will ideas

Cause and Effect – At about the 5th century BC, in his work On the Mind, the Greek Philosopher Leucippus penned the earliest known universal statement describing what we today understand as determinism, or the law of cause and effect

“Nothing happens at random, but everything for a reason and by necessity.”

Human Will – The concepts of will and free will are actually Christian in orgin. It was Saint Paul in his Letter to the Romans, which is dated at about 58 A.D., who first discovered this thing we call human will. He came to it by recognizing that he could not often do as much right as he wanted. Saint Paul wrote in Romans 7:15 that:

“I don’t understand myself at all, for I really want to do what is right, but I can’t.” I do what I don’t want to – what I hate.” (Translation – The Living Bible)

Free Will -- Nothing new was said on the matter for the next few hundred years until St. Augustine grappled with the concepts of evil and justice. Saint Augustine wrote in his book De Libero Arbitrio, 386-395 A.D., (translated as “On Free Will”)

“Evil deeds are punished by the justice of God. They would not be punished justly if they had not been performed voluntarily.”

The problem he saw was that if human beings do not have a free will, it would be unfair for God to arbitrarily reward or punish us. St. Augustine concluded that God could not be unfair, and so he created the concept of a human free will, whereby we earn our reward or punishment by what we freely do.

Scientific concepts relating to the determined will vs. free will question

Classical Mechanics -- In 1687 Sir Isaac Newton publishes his “Laws of Motions” that mathematically describes the physical universe as acting in a mechanistic manner according to the principle of cause and effect.

Classical Mechanics is a completely deterministic theory

Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle -- In 1925 Warner Heisenberg describes mathematically that…

We can measure the position of a particle or the momentum of a particle (momentum meaning its direction and velocity), but we cannot simultaneously measure the position and momentum of a particle.

Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics -- Niels Bohr and others make the following assertions;

1) Particles do not have a simultaneous position and momentum.

2) Elementary particles behave indeterministically, and are not subject to the principle of cause and effect.

Believers in free will saw the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics as providing a possibility for free will to exist. They asserted that if elementary particles behave indeterministically, they are not subject to the principle of cause and effect that prohibits free will.

But, as noted above, it eventually became apparent that indeterminism also prohibits free will.


Exploring the Illusion of Free Will, 2nd Edition Chapters

Intro. to the 2011 1st. edition 

Intro. to the 2013 2nd. edition (digital version)

1 How I came to see my causal will

2 Proving causal will in real time (omitted)

3 Morality within a causal will perspective

4 What it all means

5 We Do Not "Experience" Free Will

6 How the Hedonic Imperative Makes Free Will Impossible

7 How the Unsolicited Participation of the Unconscious Makes Free Will Impossible

8 Asking When a Child Gains it Illuminates the Incoherence of the Concept "Free Will"

9 Overcoming our Reluctance to Overcome the Illusion of Free Will

10 Why Change as the Basic Universal Process Makes Free Will Impossible

11 The Absurdity of Varying Degrees of Free Will

12 Why the Concept of Free Will is Incoherent

13 Overcoming Blame, Guilt, Envy and Arrogance by Overcoming the Illusion of Free Will

14 Why Both Causality and Randomness Make Free Will Impossible

15 Why Frankfurt's “Second Order Desires” Do Not Allow for a Free Will

16 Overcoming the Illusion of Free Will as an Evolutionary Leap in Human Consciousness

17 Revitalizing Religion through Transcending the Illusion of Free Will

18 Why Humans Cannot Circumvent Natural Law to Gain a Free Wil

Epilogue: How Refuting Free Will Went From  Academia to the Public Spotlight – with hyperlinked  articles in major publications – 2004-2012

Books Refuting Free Will and  Fundamental Moral Responsibility


YouTube Collection

Site Map


Chapters of the 2013 Exploring the Illusion of Free Will, Second Edition


Chapter 1.  How I Came to See My Causal Will

Growing up, there are things that we want – things that we want to happen, ways we want to be, and things we want to do. There is much we would prefer to be a certain way, but we realize, "Wait a minute. I can't be the way I want to be. I can't do all the things I want to do.” That's what happened to me growing up. There were many things I wanted to do, ways I wanted to be, and goals I wanted to meet. Yes, some I accomplished, but some I did not. It seemed that regardless of what I did or didn't do, it became evident that certain goals just were not going to happen. I began to understand that free will is an illusion, and that our lives and human will are causal.

Writing this book is not something that I had planned five or six years ago. So, what led me to it? It was a series of events, a series of situations. I had two friends years ago, Trish and Andy, and we did a cable TV show on spiritual and psychological issues called Conversations in Mind. It was great fun, and, after 30 episodes, I decided to do a TV show on happiness called The Happiness Show. I produced and hosted 138 half-hour episodes over three years, and gained invaluable experience in doing that kind of explanatory show. The key thing here is that the conditions that led up to this book, and everything else I'm doing now, were not really up to me. In other words, of the two friends with whom I did the first show, one I happened to meet at a nearby singles dance, and the other I happened to meet through other unplanned circumstances. These things that I didn't have control of shaped my reality, and led to my ultimately writing this book. In part and principle, that's how I came to understand free will to be an illusion.

Think about human will relative to the people you’re close to, that you love and care about. I came to realize that we all want our relationships and the rest of our lives to go as pleasantly and morally as possible. If we had a free will, our lives would go that way, at least in terms of what we say to each other, and how we feel about each other. If we had a free will, we would be completely good, and, not incidentally, completely happy. I came to realize that I can't behave the way I would like to with everyone that I would like. If I truly had a free will, I would be a perfect angel always. I would always know what to say. I would choose to feel only very positive feelings toward everyone and everything. That's one of the strongest understandings we gain from our personal lives that, no, we don't have free wills, and that free will is an illusion.

I’m describing to you how I came to this causal will understanding, but I want the explanation to relate to all of us because we all experience this reality. We’re born into a world where the causal past is what makes things happen. It’s all about cause and effect. What happens at one moment causes what happens at the next moment, which causes what happens at the next moment, and onward causally into the future. This causal chain naturally regresses back in time to before we were born, and is also what, very ironically and curiously, has led us to believe we have a free will. There are various illusions that nature has us perceive. For example, many years ago we were all quite convinced that the world was flat. It couldn’t be round, or an orb like what we now know it is, because the people on the bottom would fall off! It seemed so very simple. Ultimately we learned that it is gravity that keeps us glued to this Earth, and the idea that our world is an orb made sense.

Mother Nature loves to play tricks on us. Another illusion is that our world is completely motionless. I don’t feel anything moving. Everything seems completely still. But the reality is that we’re hurtling around the Sun at over 60 thousand miles per hour. It goes beyond that because the Sun, the whole solar system, and the whole galaxy, are all traveling through our universe at great speed. The point is that, yes, there are illusions. Mother Nature does love to play tricks on us. Most of us are familiar with the mirage illusion. You’re driving on a straight highway on a hot summer day. You look into the distance, and could swear there’s water there. For some reason, the causal past – and you could describe the causal past within a religious context as God - has determined that the vast majority of us believe that we are the masters of our fate, and that we can always do whatever we want, and say whatever we want. It’s an irony that objective causal reality would compel us to see life through this lens of illusion, to have us believe we have a free will. This may not make complete sense to you now, but as we go through the chapters, you’ll likely come to understand that free will is, in fact, an illusion – that it has to be an illusion. Over the years, not being able to be the kind of person I wanted to be, (I would, of course, see this in others also) and not being able to do what I wanted to do brought me to understand that we don’t have a free will. It seems that the causal past, what really controls everything, is now determining that it’s time for us all to understand this reality. Evidence is mounting that we’re in a period – more like the beginning of an age – where all of humanity is coming to understand that free will is an illusion. This is a very, very powerful understanding, because it changes everything.

We’re hard-wired, biologically, to seek pleasure and avoid pain. That’s who we are; that’s what we do. Other organisms share this with us. And there are other imperatives. Seeking pleasure and avoiding pain is a hedonic imperative. There’s also a moral imperative. We always do what we consider right at the time. In hindsight, it may not always be right, but we are biologically compelled to do what we think is most right, and makes the most sense – what we think is the greater of two goods, or lesser of two evils. We’re always trying to do things as well as possible, and to be as good as possible. This is actually related to the hedonic imperative, because when we’re “good,” we create happiness. Think about this. We can’t but seek pleasure and avoid pain. When we’re in a certain circumstance, and we’re given a choice between two options – what to eat, what movie to see, what friends to be with, we’re always going to choose the one that we believe will bring us the greatest pleasure. But, it’s not just about us; it’s about other people too. So, sometimes we seek the greatest good for the greatest number. We can’t avoid that. We’re programmed to always do what we think is going to bring us happiness.

Two friends of mine had a falling out. They’re good friends, but they had not talked to each other for months. One of them tells me that the other is acting in a certain way, and doing such and such, and that she can’t take it anymore. I ask her, “Why does your friend act like this? What’s causing her to act in ways that you find upsetting?” We have a back-and-forth dialogue, and I keep asking, “Why?” She might say, “Well, that’s just the way she is.” So I ask her, “Why is she that way?” After our series of questions and answers, my friend ultimately realizes that her friend acts as she does because her parents raised her in a certain way, because she was raised in a certain environment, and because she had a certain genetic predisposition. Our personalities are about 50 percent genetic, and if our genes aren’t determining our personality, then it is being determined by our upbringing and environment. So, it’s easy to see how if our parents raised us a certain way, and we were taught in certain schools, and we met certain people – if certain environmental influences molded who we are – we do not have a free will. Ultimately, my friend came to see that her friend had to be the way she was. She couldn’t help it. It’s all about the causal past. That’s the reality, and it’s not a pleasant reality for some people, because they conclude, “Aw gee, if we don’t have a free will that means we’re just robots, we’re just puppets, we’re just automatons.” Well, yes, that’s the reality. I’ve understood this for years. You get accustomed to it, and it can actually make our understanding and experience of reality more pleasant and wonderful.

Let’s say you believe in God. I equate God with the universe. If God is everywhere and God is everything, then God is the universe. I ascribe to God more wisdom and understanding than I would to an individual. If you’re not so comfortable with the reality of our wills being causal, that God is the only power on Earth, and that the causal past is determining everything today, perhaps you can appreciate that God would likely be wiser than we are. You may then want to conclude that it’s probably better for all concerned that reality is causal, or God-willed. If our choices were up to us, we’d probably make fewer good choices. How else did I come to realize and discover that free will is an illusion? One way has been through basic education. I’ve read many books about psychology, and taken psychology courses, and one thing you learn in psychology is that we all have an unconscious. Freud popularized this fact, and we all understand it now. One important thing we know about the unconscious is that it is always awake. In other words, our consciousness will go to sleep, and we won’t remember much of what happened when we were asleep. But our unconscious, when we’re both asleep and awake, is always working. It’s always active, and influencing our reality.

There has been empirical evidence since the time of the discovery of hypnosis that a person’s unconscious can control, or decide, one’s thoughts even though one thinks one is making the choice. Through experiments with hypnosis, and now also in neuroscience, we’ve discovered that even though we think we’re making choices, it is actually our unconscious that is making those choices. Your unconscious is your memory store – your store of feelings, of experiences, etc. That’s where everything is stored, and you’re unaware of all that is there because you can’t be aware, at least in real time, of what is unconscious. This is how it made sense to me. If your unconscious never sleeps, and is a part of every decision you make, then that is a very clear way to understand that free will is an illusion. We can’t control our unconscious. That’s the point. Our unconscious, by definition and experience, is something we’re not conscious of. It’s operating behind the scenes. When we say that we have a free will, basically we’re saying that everything we decide is up to us – that we can consciously decide what to do or not. But if our unconscious takes part in our every decision, and we don’t know what the unconscious is doing, then the best we’re left with is a consciousness-unconscious collaboration on every decision. If that’s the case, and we can’t control our unconscious, you can understand how our unconscious makes free will impossible.

We don’t have a free will. We can’t be as happy as we want to be. We can’t be as good as we want to be. Five seconds from now, I have no idea what I am going to say. These thoughts I’m saying right now are just popping into my head. I have a basic understanding of what I want to do, but I purposely didn’t over-prepare this show because I wanted to demonstrate how these thoughts are coming to my mind from who knows where. Naturally, what I say is a result of my having researched this topic, having thought about it deeply, having talked about it often and at length, and having finally come to very clearly and strongly understand that free will is an illusion. All these things are a part of what’s causing me to say what I say, but from a moment-to-moment perspective, these thoughts are just coming to me. Thirty seconds from now, I have no idea what I’ll be saying. Thoughts just come to us, and that is another way of understanding why free will is an illusion.

I want to end with a very positive point. Giving up the illusion of free will doesn’t actually make life worse, or less meaningful. It actually makes it better because when we give up the illusion of free will and other people do wrong, we don’t blame them. We don’t say, “Oh, you’re a bad person. You did wrong.” We understand that they were compelled to do wrong, and we become more understanding, and forgiving, and compassionate toward them. When we do wrong, we will not blame ourselves because our wills are as causal and compelled as anyone else’s. So, we don’t feel the pain of guilt. When others do something really great, we sometimes feel envious, but we wouldn’t under a causal will perspective because we would know that whatever they did was not up to them; it was completely compelled by factors outside of their control. Our world is changing, and once humanity understands that we don’t have a free will, everything will in many ways be profoundly new.

Next chapter


List of Chapters

Intro. to 2011 edition  Intro. to 2013 digital edition 1  (2 omitted)  3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   Epilogue  Books Refuting Free Will...