DOWNLOADS: PDF of EXPLORING THE ILLUSION OF FREE WILL, SECOND EDITION
and
PDF of
FREE WILL -
MOVING BEYOND THE ILLUSION: SCREENPLAY FOR A DOCUMENTARY
BY
George Ortega
"The debate about free
will, long the purview
of philosophers alone,
has been given new life
by scientists,
especially
neuroscientists studying
how the brain works. And
what they're finding
supports the idea that
free will is a complete
illusion."
"In an intriguing review
in the July 2 edition of
the journal Science,
published online
Thursday, Ruud Custers
and Henk Aarts of
Utrecht University in
the Netherlands lay out
the mounting evidence of
the power of what they
term the 'unconscious
will.'...John Bargh of
Yale University, who 10
years ago predicted many
of the findings
discussed by Custers and
Aarts in a paper
entitled "The Unbearable
Automaticity of Being,"
called the Science
paper a "landmark —
nothing like this has
been in Science
before."
"Some
people think that
quantum mechanics shows
that determinism is
false, and so holds out
a hope that we can be
ultimately responsible
for what we do. But even
if quantum mechanics had
shown that determinism
is false (it hasn’t),
the question would
remain: how can
indeterminism, objective
randomness, help in any
way whatever to make you
responsible for your
actions? The answer to
this question is easy.
It can’t."
"In modern science, it is
difficult to find the
gap into which to slip
free will—the uncaused
causer—because there
seems to be no part of
the machinery that does
not follow in a causal
relationship from the
other parts."
"The philosophical
definition of free will
uses the phrase 'could
have done otherwise'... "As a neuroscientist,
you've got to be a
determinist. There are
physical laws, which the
electrical and chemical
events in the brain
obey. Under identical
circumstances, you
couldn't have done
otherwise; there's no
'I' which can say 'I
want to do otherwise'."
"The
discovery that humans
possess a determined
will has profound
implications for moral
responsibility. Indeed,
Harris is even critical
of the idea that free
will is "intuitive": he
says careful
introspection can cast
doubt on free will. In
an earlier book on
morality, Harris argues
'Thoughts simply arise
in the brain. What else
could they do? The truth
about us is even
stranger than we may
suppose: The illusion of
free will is itself an
illusion'"
If you think carefully
about any decision you
have made in the past,
you will recognize that
all of them were
ultimately based on
similar—genetic or
social—inputs to which
you had been exposed.
And you will also
discover that you had no
control over these
inputs, which means that
you had no free will in
taking the decisions you
did.
Cause and Effect
– At about the 5th century BC,
in his work On the Mind,
the Greek Philosopher Leucippus
penned the earliest known
universal statement describing
what we today understand as
determinism, or the law of cause
and effect
“Nothing happens at random,
but everything for a reason and
by necessity.”
Human Will –
The concepts of will and free
will are actually Christian in
orgin. It was Saint Paul in his
Letter to the Romans, which is
dated at about 58 A.D., who
first discovered this thing we
call human will. He came to it
by recognizing that he could not
often do as much right as he
wanted. Saint Paul wrote in
Romans 7:15 that:
“I don’t understand myself at
all, for I really want to do
what is right, but I can’t.” I
do what I don’t want to – what I
hate.” (Translation – The Living
Bible)
Free Will --
Nothing new was said on the
matter for the next few hundred
years until St. Augustine
grappled with the concepts of
evil and justice. Saint
Augustine wrote in his book
De Libero Arbitrio, 386-395
A.D., (translated as “On Free
Will”)
“Evil deeds are punished by
the justice of God. They would
not be punished justly if they
had not been performed
voluntarily.”
The problem he saw was that
if human beings do not have a
free will, it would be unfair
for God to arbitrarily reward or
punish us. St. Augustine
concluded that God could not be
unfair, and so he created the
concept of a human free will,
whereby we earn our reward or
punishment by what we freely do.
Scientific concepts
relating to the determined will
vs. free will question
Classical Mechanics
-- In 1687 Sir Isaac Newton
publishes his “Laws of Motions”
that mathematically describes
the physical universe as acting
in a mechanistic manner
according to the principle of
cause and effect.
Classical Mechanics is a
completely deterministic theory
Heisenberg
Uncertainty Principle
-- In 1925 Warner Heisenberg
describes mathematically that…
We can measure the position
of a particle or the momentum of
a particle (momentum meaning its
direction and velocity), but we
cannot simultaneously measure
the position and momentum of a
particle.
Copenhagen
Interpretation of Quantum
Mechanics -- Niels Bohr
and others make the following
assertions;
1) Particles do not have a
simultaneous position and
momentum.
2) Elementary particles
behave indeterministically, and
are not subject to the principle
of cause and effect.
Believers in free will saw
the Heisenberg Uncertainty
Principle and Copenhagen
Interpretation of Quantum
Mechanics as providing a
possibility for free will to
exist. They asserted that if
elementary particles behave
indeterministically, they are
not subject to the principle of
cause and effect that prohibits
free will.
But, as noted above, it
eventually became apparent that
indeterminism also prohibits
free will.
Exploring the Illusion of Free Will,
2nd Edition Chapters
81. No Free
Will Isn't a License to Do
Whatever We Want
In this episode of Exploring
the Illusion of Free Will,
recorded on August 2, 2012,
hosts George and Enel explain
that although human will is not
free, we must nevertheless
uphold ethical and legal
standards.
82. We Don't Have
Free Will Because God Created Us
In this episode of Exploring the
Illusion of Free Will, co-hosts
George Ortega and Enel describe
why we humans are not
"ultimately" responsible because
we were created by God.
83. Free Will
and No Third Alternative To
Causality and Randomness
In this episode of Exploring the
Illusion of Free Will, hosts
George Ortega and Enel explain
how both causality and
randomness (otherwise known as
unpredictability, acausality,
and indeterminism) prohibit free
will, and why conceptually and
empirically there is no third
alternative to these two
possibilities
84. The No
Free Will Way of Addressing
Crime
In
this episode of Exploring the
Illusion of Free Will, recorded
on August 10,2012, co-hosts
George Ortega and Enel discuss
how society's overcoming the
illusion of free will would lead
to a more intelligent,
effective, and compassionate
criminal justice system.
85. Why Some People Don't Get It
About Free Will
In this episode of Exploring the
Illusion of Free Will, recorded
on August 10, 2012, co-hosts
George Ortega and Enel explore
how ostensibly intelligent and
educated individuals, and major
societal institutions, fail to
grasp the quite elementary
conclusion that causality
completely and unequivocally
makes free will impossible.
86. No Free
Will - Humanity's New
Consciousness
In this episode of Exploring the
Illusion of Free Will, recorded
on September 14, 2012, co-hosts
George Ortega and Enel describe
why our world transcending the
illusion of free will amounts to
a new causal consciousness for
our species.
87.
Free Will Claims Based on Fears
and Desires
In this episode of Exploring the
Illusion of Free Will, recorded
on September 14, 2012, co-hosts
George Ortega and Enel discuss
how and why some people argue
for the existence of free will
according to their fears and
desires.
88.
Un-Free Will is Driven by
Hard-Wired Drives
In this episode of Exploring the
Illusion of Free Will, recorded
on September 14, 2012, co-hosts
George Ortega and Enel talk
about our genetic drives like
our hedonic and moral
imperatives make free will
impossible.
89. Custers and
Aarts Undermine Free Will in
Journal Science,
Part I
In this episode of Exploring the
Illusion of Free Will, host
George Ortega discusses Ruud
Custers and Henk Aarts' landmark
July 2, 2010 review paper
challenging free will published
in the prestigious peer-review journal
Science.
Among the work covered by the
Utrecht University psychologists
is research by Libet, Gleason,
Wright, Bargh, Gilbert, Maas,
Sheeran, Wildenbeest, Gollwitzer,
Lee-Chai, Barndollar, Pearl,
Hassin, Uleman, Cohen, Ferguson,
Dollard, Tsuchiya, Jaynes,
Veltkamp, Marien and others.
See the YouTube page for free
access to their original paper.
90. Custers
and Aarts Undermine Free Will in
Journal Science, Part II
In this episode of Exploring the
Illusion of Free Will, host
George Ortega discusses Ruud
Custers and Henk Aarts' landmark
July 2, 2010 review paper
challenging free will published
in the prestigious peer- review journal
Science.
Among the work covered by the
Utrecht University psychologists
is research by Libet, Gleason,
Wright, Bargh, Gilbert, Maas,
Sheeran, Wildenbeest, Gollwitzer,
Lee-Chai, Barndollar, Pearl,
Hassin, Uleman, Cohen, Ferguson,
Dollard, Tsuchiya, Jaynes,
Veltkamp, Marien and others.
See the YouTube page for free
access to their original paper.