|
The Impossibility of Free Will
by George Ortega
February 28, 2000
There is no free will. The
notion that we have a will separate
from that of God is similar in kind
to the mistaken belief, a few
centuries ago, that our planet was
the center of the universe, or, that
life exists only on our planet.
Man has long been consumed by a need
to glorify himself beyond what
evidence justifies. The belief that
we human beings have the power, or
will, to decide what we think, say
or do is, perhaps, the most blatant
and pervasive example of this need.
Let us proceed directly to an
examination and refutation of the
myth of free will.
Upon reading this sentence, you will
experience a reaction. This
reaction, of which you are by now
undoubtedly aware, was probably
slight. Most likely it expressed
recognition of the obvious truth in
the statement. In no way willed it
into your consciousness, it came of
its own accord.
When you finish reading the
following sentence, you will have a
much different reaction. The planet
Earth will explode tomorrow.
Initially, you probably emotionally
considered the prospect of the
Earth, and hence, all you know and
love, ending so very soon. This
reaction was most likely quickly
followed by a reasonable judgment
that the statement is most probably
mistaken. Again, you neither willed
the emotional or subsequent
cognitive reaction to the sentence.
They both came to you of their own
accord.
Let us now proceed to the
investigation of a conscious
decision. After reading this
sentence, if you wish, form the
image of a starry sky in your mind.
By now, you have probably decided
either to form the image suggested
or to resist doing so and opt
instead for, perhaps, a thought
expressing refusal to do so.
If, in fact, you formed the image of
a starry sky, you did so perhaps
simply because you found no
objection to following my
suggestion. If, on the other hand,
you refused, you must have had
sufficient reason, like, for
example, the thought that
participating in such an exercise
was unnecessary to your
understanding the matter of free
will.
In either case, while it may at
first appear that you willed your
decision whether or not to form the
image, upon further analysis, we
discover that this decision, as in
our first exercise, came to you from
outside of your own will.
The evidence is simple and obvious.
If you formed the starry sky image,
you would have done this because
nothing in your past experience
provided sufficient objection to
your doing so. If you did not, on
the other hand, clearly you refused
because your past experience led you
to believe your doing so would be
either unnecessary or unwise.
Perhaps you had previously read
philosophical arguments suggesting
similar exercises and learned that
they distracted one from more than
illumined an understanding of the
matter under consideration. In both
cases, then, the determining factor
was your past experience and not
your will.
It might be imagined that one's past
experience, nonetheless, results
from one's will, however, this
argument is easily refuted when we
accept the premise that, to the best
of our knowledge, human beings do
not decide to be born as human
beings. Nor do we decide to whom we
are born, in what country, how we
would be raised, or what manner of
personality we would develop.
Returning to our example, a person
forming the starry sky image might
have developed a personality
forbidding the study of philosophy,
and his past circumstances provided
no reason to do so. A second person,
on the other hand, may either have
been granted the kind of personality
which led him to investigate
arguments like this in his past, or
he may have, in fact, been led to
investigating philosophical
arguments by, for example, a
required high school or college
course.
It should be clear from the
proceeding that thoughts and
feelings simply come into one's
consciousness based upon factors
outside of one's self such as
influences deriving from one's
past. Hence, with regard to
thoughts and feelings, free will
plays no part.
The reasoning refuting the idea that
anything we do or say is a result of
our having free will is exactly the
same as apply to thoughts and
feelings, however, for the sake of
greater understanding, let us now
investigate the cause or causes of
what we do and say with the
following example.
In this case we present this
argument in a more simple and direct
manner. A person lifts his hand to
hail a taxi. Again, we are tempted
to conclude that this person of a
free will performed the act, until
we examine his motive or motives.
For our example, we accept that the
person wished to take a taxi ride to
a certain destination and that the
person was standing along a street
looking for a taxi.
Upon seeing a taxi traveling in his
direction, he recalls from past
experience that to hail a taxi, one
lifts his hand and motions in a
communicative manner. What other
choice could the person have in this
situation? The answer, of course,
is none. Circumstances, and
his recall of past experience, not
his will, have determined
his actions.
At this point, one might consider
that while the person waving his
hand was an act of necessity rather
than free will, the circumstances
that determined this act, his
decision to take a taxi, may have
been an act of free will.
To investigate this possibility, we
need simply select one reason, from
the many possible, why the person
might wish to hail a taxi. Let us
select the one reason that would
appear to be most based upon the
individual's seeming free will; He
simply felt like taking a taxi
rather than walking. This, of
course, now takes us back to our
initial understanding that thoughts,
feelings, and decisions are not
derived from free will. In the
present example, the person simply
felt like riding in a taxi. He could
not explain why he felt this way. He
simply did, and this is sufficient
evidence that the feeling came on
its own. Before we leave this
example, let us suppose he, instead,
wished a taxi ride because he felt
too tired to walk. In this instance
we are led back to the understanding
that a past event, the
unpleasantness of walking while
tired, and not free will, led to his
wish to take a taxi.
The previous paragraphs should
suffice to demonstrate the
impossibility of free will. The
remaining question becomes, "if free
will does not dictate our feelings
thoughts and actions, what does?"
We have begun to answer this
question by citing that
circumstances and past experience
are the two determinants, working in
tandem, to determine every thought
or action. In the starry sky
example, the circumstance of my
suggestion dictated the question as
to whether or not to form an image,
and past experience dictated whether
or not that image would be a starry
sky. In the taxi example, the
circumstance of wanting to ride a
taxi determines the question of
hailing or not, and past experience
determines that hailing is an act
necessary to obtain the taxi.
The negation of free will has
historically been termed
Determinism; the understanding that
every action is guided by the law of
cause and effect. This law states
that every effect (or action,) is
determined by a previous cause or
causes.
Let us follow a string of effects
and their causes as far back as
possible, eliminating, for the sake
of clarity and brevity, many
intermediate causes. The subject in
our example will be the reader. You
were caused, or "created," by your
parents. They were caused by their
parents. Skipping many generations,
your ancestors were created by
non-human beings of the ape family.
Again skipping many generations,
the apes descended from single
celled organisms. The cause giving
rise to these organisms was the
planet Earth. Again skipping all in
between, the word we use to describe
that which created our planet and
everything else within our universe
is God; hence the popular definition
of God as the "First Cause."
At this point, let me make clear
that while the word God has specific
religious connotations, in this
context, God is defined simply as
the preceder to, or creator of,
everything. Actually there is good
reason for confusion when
scientifically discussing a creator
or first cause. Logic dictates
that even the first cause must have
had a previous cause, presenting a
question that transcends logic
altogether.
Notwithstanding, now that we have
gained a clear understanding of
Determinism and how every thought,
feeling, and action is governed by
the law of cause and effect, and
have demonstrated the impossibility
of free will, let us explore what
promise this holds with regard to
human life in our present day.
The mistaken belief in free will
gives rise to four mistaken
conclusions. 1. We are to be
credited for the good we do. 2. We
are responsible for the wrong we do.
3. Others are to be credited for
the good they do. 4. Others are to
be held responsible for the wrong
they do.
The result from these mistaken
conclusions is our becoming
separated from ourselves and our
remaining separated from each other.
Simply explained, the first mistaken
conclusion gives rise to feelings of
conceit or unhealthy pride which
ultimately separate one from one's
"true" self and create an
unnecessary barrier between others
and oneself. The second mistaken
notion gives rise to unnecessary
feelings of guilt and contempt for
oneself which cause needless
suffering and, again, also separate
oneself from others. The third
mistaken notion causes us to see
others as being better than
ourselves leading to unwise envy and
unnecessary feelings of inferiority.
The forth mistaken notion causes us
to wrongly blame and punish others
for their imperfections leading to a
continuing cycle of vengeance and
revenge.
If we, as a species, are to evolve
to a higher state than that in which
we presently find ourselves, with
its ubiquitous anxiety and
suffering, we must first overcome
our belief in free will and then not
simply understand, but also
emotionally integrate, the fact that
we are governed by the principle of
determinism.
To refuse doing so is to, as it
were, continue to believe in a flat
Earth and never dare venture past
its illusory horizon. The
scientific community, which has for
over a century understood that the
laws of cause and effect govern
everything on our planet, is best
suited to leading our population
beyond the mistaken belief in free
will to a proper understanding of
determinism. To refrain, for fear
of a world religious community as
unable to move past the notion of
free will as they are to move past
the notion of Creationism, in
today's world, is no longer
justified. |